LawMeme LawMeme Yale Law School  
Search LawMeme [ Advanced Search ]
What is wrong with New York Times v Tasini
Posted by Ernest Miller on Friday, July 06 @ 06:00:00 EDT Copyright
In New York Times v. Tasini, the US Supreme Court extended copyright so that freelancers would have control over placement of their works in electronic database versions of print journals, for example, when the New York Times made its issues (including the work of freelancers) available through Nexis. Jeffrey Rosen explains (Freelanced) in The New Republic why the Supreme Court was wrong. Rosen is right, mostly, but it is hard to sympathize with the publishers. Enforcing this new right is not going to be easy, but the National Writers Union has filed a new lawsuit against the New York Times (Freelancers Plan Return to Court) in order to try.

The National Writers Union has a guide to the issues.

Wired coverage (Freelancers Fear Blacklisting).



Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Related Links
· More about Copyright
· News by Ernest Miller

Most read story about Copyright:
The Original SSSCA and Updates

Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Very Good


Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend
"User's Login" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

Leges humanae nascuntur, vivunt, moriuntur
Human laws are born, live, and die

All stories, comments and submissions copyright their respective posters.
Everything Else Copyright (c) 2002 by the Information Society Project.
This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later (the latest version is presently available at

You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php