LawMeme LawMeme Yale Law School  
LawMeme
Search LawMeme [ Advanced Search ]
 
 
 
 
Links: Malpractice Plaintiffs Database
Posted by Steven Wu on Tuesday, March 09 @ 17:00:42 EST Privacy
Some Texas doctors have begun keeping an online database of patients who have brought malpractice lawsuits in the past. The database's purpose seems to be to allow doctors to assess how "risky" treating a particular patient is.
For months, an obscure Texas company run by doctors has been operating a Web site, DoctorsKnow Us.com, that compiles and posts the names of plaintiffs, their lawyers and expert witnesses in malpractice lawsuits in Texas and beyond, regardless of the merit of the claim.

"You may use the service to assess the risk of offering your services to clients or potential clients," the Web site says. . . .

"They can sue but they can't hide," says the Web site. . . .

The sponsors draw no distinctions among cases

The biggest objection I can see to this database is the bolded sentence: the database doesn't seem to distinguish between pesky, litigation-prone plaintiffs, and genuinely aggrieved patients.

Of course, it's difficult to determine what level of detail is needed in order to ensure that the database "fairly" represents plaintiffs. Some plaintiffs might have a legitimate grievance, but nevertheless lose the suit for legal reasons unrelated to the merits of the case: statute of limitations, lack of personal jurisdiction, exclusion of evidence, etc. Other plaintiffs might win a suit for reasons unrelated to the merits: e.g., a non-appearance by the doctor. And settlements are, of course, big black boxes: does the doctor admit fault, or not? So the unfairness created by the extremely limited description in the database might be difficult to remedy.

There's another issue: what resources do patients have to research whether their doctors have been sued for malpractice? According to this website, 15 states (including Texas) allow potential patients to look up disciplinary actions. This website links to several searchable online databases--most of which charge a fee. Finally, California has a great searchable database that claims to allow people to look up malpractice suits. Unfortunately, I don't know any doctors who have had malpractice suits against them, so I can't vouch for the accuracy of any of these databases. But the existence of the malpractice-doctor databases might make the existence of this malpractice-patient database seem more fair.

Of course, I can see why people would be upset by a malpractice-plaintiff database. The concern is that people would be deterred from bringing lawsuits for fear that they'll be unable to get medical care in the future. On the other hand, the lack of such a database will just mean that litigation-fearing doctors will be ever more cautious about treating all patients--or else they'll mandate so many tests and re-tests and double/triple checks that medical costs skyrocket so that doctors will be shielded from liability.

Comments are welcome. This is a very interesting question, and one with life-and-death implications.

 
Related Links
· More about Privacy
· News by Steven Wu


Most read story about Privacy:
Accidental Privacy Spills: Musings on Privacy, Democracy, and the Internet

Options

 Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

 Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend

Threshold
  
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

Re: Malpractice Plaintiffs Database (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 09 @ 21:45:50 EST
It wasn't clear to me from the article what percentage of doctors in Texas are actually using this service. It could be a very isolated phenomenon.


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Malpractice Plaintiffs Database (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 10 @ 13:07:48 EST
This is from the "whois" database: Administrative Contact: Limited Liability Company, doctorsknow.us (JXJ239) shanj1@aol.com 201 sunray lane SUNNYVALE, TX 75182 US 9722260313 fax: 123 123 1234


[ Reply to This ]


Re: Malpractice Plaintiffs Database (Score: 1)
by JimCYL on Thursday, March 11 @ 12:46:49 EST
(User Info | Send a Message) http://synicism-online.blogspot.com
What I find most interesting about all this is that the results of malpractice actions are generally public record, so I don't know if the site is doing anything illegal. Nevertheless, I wonder if the use of the site to blacklist potential patients who have won large judgments in the past could violate some kind of private right.


[ Reply to This ]


Leges humanae nascuntur, vivunt, moriuntur
Human laws are born, live, and die

Contributors retain copyright interests in all stories, comments and submissions.
The PHP-Nuke engine on which LawMeme runs is copyright by PHP-Nuke, and is freely available under the GNU GPL.
Everything else is copyright copyright 2002-04 by the Information Society Project.

This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later.
The latest version is currently available at http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/.

You can syndicate our news with backend.php



Page Generation: 0.156 Seconds