 |
|
 |
 |
Jason Pielemeier reports from the trenches (lightly edited):
Lots of discussion on the substantive rights (Art's 6-10), very little consensus. US made an interesting proposal to make the treaty only require a 'right to prohibit' and clarified that this would be a non-transferable right that could not be licensed. Canada restated their position on rebroadcast. Brazil continues not to be satisfied w/ the current language.
Sounds like there are provisions made to do a night session tonight (not sure how typical this is) so as to make all possible put together something concrete to send to the dip conf. Not sure that even with a night session, this will be possible.
|
|
 |
| |
 |
Login |
 |
 |
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. |
|
 |
 |
Related Links |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Article Rating |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Options |
 |
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
|