LawMeme LawMeme Yale Law School  
LawMeme
Search LawMeme [ Advanced Search ]
 
 
 
 
NY Times Columnist Calls for Book Burning
Posted by Ernest Miller on Tuesday, September 17 @ 13:11:39 EDT Free Expression
The New York Times (reg. req.) publishes an op-ed piece by Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, now columnist Nicholas Kristof in which he argues in favor, literally, of government censorship and book burning (Recipes for Death). How ironic that this is published by the same newspaper that famously fought the Pentagon Papers case. Can Pulitzer Prizes be revoked?

This article is wrong on so many levels that it isn't even funny. I might go into detail about how recent, successful terrorist attacks have generally used very low tech means (flying planes into buildings, truck bombs, suicide bombers) and how even if we could guarantee there would be no weapons of mass destruction used in terrorism, that wouldn't stop terrorism or even lower the potential body count much or how it would be very difficult to define what is and isn't dangerous knowledge and do we really want the government to make the call or mention the fact that terrorist receive much of their training overseas where US censorship wouldn't reach, etc. But I won't. I will, instead, focus on a single, glaring flaw that Kristof's argument doesn't address:

Our small presses could end up helping terrorists much more than Saddam ever has.
Memo to Kristof: In the modern age, a small press is a computer and a printer. A large press is a computer with an Internet connection.

Kristof argues that we should ban books detailing means of chemical, nuclear and biologic warfare. This necessarily means that we will have to ban this information on the Internet. It is relatively easy to eliminate physical books. It would create all sorts of interesting challenges to censor particular information on the Internet (which, as we all know, is chock-a-block with steganographic terrorist messages already). How would Kristof propose to censor the Internet? Would he adopt the policies of China and Saudi Arabia? I see no other means to achieve his goal.

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Related Links
· New York Times
· Nicholas Kristof
· Recipes for Death
· Pentagon Papers
· More about Free Expression
· News by Ernest Miller


Most read story about Free Expression:
Supreme Court Upholds Portions of Net Pornography Law

Article Rating
Average Score: 3.33
Votes: 3


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


Options

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend
"User's Login" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment
Threshold
  
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: NY Times Columnist Calls for Book Burning (Score: 1)
by MurphysLaw on Wednesday, September 18 @ 13:36:24 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://
The OpEd page (so named because it is Opposite the Editorials) features a wider selection of viewpoints than the Editorial page does. The views expressed there are those of the writer and not necessarially the Times. I have no doubt that there are strong reasons to object to Kristof's point of view. You will see those printed as letters to the editor or perhaps in an answering OpEd piece.


[ Reply to This ]


Leges humanae nascuntur, vivunt, moriuntur
Human laws are born, live, and die


All stories, comments and submissions copyright their respective posters.
Everything Else Copyright (c) 2002 by the Information Society Project.
This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later (the latest version is presently available at http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/).

You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php