 |
| |
 |
Links: Nitke v Ashcroft : Seth Finkelstein expert report |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Seth_Finkelstein writes "People concerned about issues of Internet censorship and
community standards might be interested my now-released work for
the Nitke v. Ashcroft case. In
particular, I argue that anonymity and privacy services make
location determinaton too unreliable for the purposes of criminal law.
Nitke vs. Ashcroft : Seth Finkelstein expert witness report
I. Opinion of Witness with Basis and Reasons Therefore
" A provider of content via the Internet cannot reasonably be
expected to know the location of readers, if the context is one in
which location would lead to a denial of the ability to read the content."
"
|
|
 |
| |
 |
Related Links |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Options |
 |
| The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
|
Leges
humanae nascuntur, vivunt, moriuntur
Human laws are born, live, and die
Contributors retain copyright interests in all stories, comments and submissions.
The PHP-Nuke engine on which LawMeme runs is copyright by PHP-Nuke, and is freely available under the GNU GPL.
Everything else is copyright
copyright 2002-04 by the Information Society Project.
This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later.
The latest version is currently available at http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/.
You can syndicate our news with backend.php
Page Generation: 0.072 Seconds
|