 |
| |
 |
Posted by Lea Bishop on Monday, May 10 @ 15:49:39 EDT
|
|
|
 |
 |
Rashad Hussain, Policy Comment: Security with Transparency: Judicial Review in “Special Interest” Immigration Proceedings, 113 YALE L.J. 1333 (2004).
This Comment criticizes the practice of secrecy in “special interest” immigration hearings enacted post-September 11th. The author argues that by failing to require judges to determine that individual aliens pose a security threat before granting a closed hearing, the policy is overly broad in pursuing its security aims. Examining an alternative model—the open hearings of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court (ATRC)—the Comment proposes a compromise scheme based upon the model but permitting closed hearings after an individualized adjudication of whether the particular alien has terrorist ties. Such a model would permit the state to conceal the identities of truly high-risk detainees, while retaining valuable procedural safeguards.
|
|
 |
| |
 |
Related Links |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Options |
 |
| The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
|
Leges
humanae nascuntur, vivunt, moriuntur
Human laws are born, live, and die
Contributors retain copyright interests in all stories, comments and submissions.
The PHP-Nuke engine on which LawMeme runs is copyright by PHP-Nuke, and is freely available under the GNU GPL.
Everything else is copyright
copyright 2002-04 by the Information Society Project.
This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later.
The latest version is currently available at http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/.
You can syndicate our news with backend.php
Page Generation: 0.071 Seconds
|