 |
Hi-Tech CD Protection vs. Markers: Markers Win! |
|
 |
| |
 |
Login |
 |
 |
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. |
|
 |
 |
Related Links |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Article Rating |
 |
 |
Average Score: 4.6 Votes: 5

|
|
 |
 |
Options |
 |
"User's Login" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments |
| The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
Intentional product damage (Score: 1) by RGSharpe on Tuesday, May 21 @ 13:12:26 EDT (User Info | Send a Message) http:// | This makes things interesting. It seems that there might be an argument about the CD being damaged by having a part of its data surface inked over.
How does the consumer's ownership of the CD (regardless of the data content), and therefore his decision to use, abuse, or deface the product stack up against the copyright owner's protection scheme?
And is it a violation of DMCA provisions if all you do is deface a physical product? If so, accidentally snapping the rabbit ears on my TV or using an AOL CD as a coaster might soon get me in hot water. |
[ Reply to This ]
Banning Markers (Score: 1) by greglas on Tuesday, May 21 @ 15:15:30 EDT (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.chaihana.com/pers.html | Well, actually, couldn't sales of magic markers already be prohibited under 1201(a)(2)?
(2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that -
(A) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;
Not (A), because markers are made for other things...
(B) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title; or
Not (B), because people conceivably might buy markers for other "commercially significant" purposes (there's a huge refrigerator art market out there)...
(C) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.
Yikes! -- what if the marker makers' marketers 'fess up to knowing about marker circumvention? Then they are prohibited from selling the markers "for" that "use."
Be prepared to answer the question: "Exactly why do you want to buy that magic marker?" |
[ Reply to This ]
|
Leges humanae nascuntur, vivunt, moriuntur
Human laws are born, live, and die
All stories, comments and submissions copyright their respective posters. Everything Else
Copyright (c) 2002 by the Information Society Project.
This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set
forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later
(the latest version is presently available at http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/).
You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php
|